Problems with the prospective connected autonomous vehicles regulation: Finding a fair balance versus the instinct for self-preservation

There would seem to be a potential regulatory problem with the crash algorithms for connected and autonomous vehicles that (normally) “kick in” should inevitable. Although general considerations which have been put forward tend seek “fair balance” protect various users of roads, configuration shielded other parties at cost car user could seen as posing an existential threat by encroaching on his or her right self-preservation. “Hacking system” (i.e. modifying in order obtain more favourable outcome user) therefore understood acting one's instinct self-preservation – though illegal certain situations turn out action is not punishable law. The present article argues real post-crash situations, person who has modified code own benefit exonerated basis existing legal provisions thus go unpunished. This create unforeseen flaws system.